By
Pace Law

Minor Injury Guideline: Punitive And Unjust Law

December 9, 2013

Toronto Personal Injury Lawyer Alex Voudouris: On September 1, 2010, the Ontario Government radically changed the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS), to the detriment of all accident victims. For example, medical and rehabilitation limits were reduced from the non-catastrophically injured limit of $100,000 to $3,500, if someone has sustained an impairment that is predominantly a Minor Injury as defined in the SABS and the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

Additionally, if one were considered a “MIG,” then they would be disentitled to claim attendant care benefits. Other than the obvious, the problem with the Minor Injury Guideline is that it potentially encompasses Major Injuries, such as a 99% tear to every muscle, tendon or ligament in your body.

Since coming into force, insurance companies have reportedly slotted some 85% of all accident benefit claimants into the MIG. Personally, I had a client who was catatonic as a result of a motor vehicle accident, and for months the insurer claimed he was simply a MIG. So it was a pleasant surprise when the Financial Services Commission of Ontario released its first ever decision concerning the MIG, in the case of Scarlett and Belair. In the decision, Arbitrator John Wilson essentially turned the MIG on its head, and ruled:

1. The MIG is an exclusionary clause, and as such all accident benefit claimants are automatically outside the MIG unless the insurer proves otherwise.

2. TMJ (Temporomandibular joint; found in the jaw) and chronic pain will keep accident victims outside the MIG.

3. Compelling evidence as required by the MIG, in terms of establishing a pre-existing medical condition is a barrier to recovery in the MIG, means evidence on a balance of probabilities.

4. Insurers are prohibited from taking a cookie-cutter approach to every claimant.

5. The MIG, being a Guideline, is only interpretive, and not binding.

While the Scarlett decision is great news for accident victims, the time for rejoicing is not upon us yet. Nearly every insurer is ignoring the decision, and Belair has appealed it.

I have now been asked by Mr. Scarlett’s original law firm to co-counsel the appeal, which was heard on September 10th, 2013. If all goes well, it may be possible to have a decision by year’s end. Until then, accident victims will continue to be re-victimized by this wholly punitive and unjust law.

Pace’s personal injury lawyers have been helping accident victims since 1980.

Share This Post
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Trending Posts
Read More Insights
Wills And Estates
By
Pace Law
Estate planning, essential for ensuring posthumous wishes are met, remains an area 70% of Canadians neglect. This deficiency largely stems from misconceptions, such as believing estate planning is only for the wealthy or thinking they’re too young to start.
Criminal Defence Law
By
Pace Law
In Ontario, adherence to driving regulations is critical for public safety, but violations occur, leading to criminal charges.
Wills And Estates
By
Angela Barrientos
Have you ever thought about estate planning and concluded it’s unnecessary because you don’t own any real estate?
Corporate and Personal Law
By
Pace Law
A Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) is an integral document used when the shares of a corporation are being purchased. The document outlines the agreement between the buyer and seller and can be quite complex.
Wills And Estates
By
Angela Barrientos
A will is a legal document that clearly states how a person’s property and belongings will be divided after their passing.

Get in Touch

Call us now or fill out the form to discuss your case with an experienced legal professional.

Our Locations

Office Location

191 The West Mall, Suite 1100
Toronto, ON M9C 5K8
Phone: 1-877-236-3060
Fax: 416-236-1809

Office Location

191 The West Mall, Suite 1100
Toronto, ON M9C 5K8
Phone: 1-877-236-3060
Fax: 416-236-1809

Scroll to Top