By
Pace Law

Beware of Quickie Divorces from Foreign Jurisdictions

October 29, 2012

Immigration lawyer Karen Kwan Anderson: This post refers to clients who have married foreign nationals and subsequently discover that the foreign spouse had a prior divorce that was not valid. This means that the current marriage is not recognized in Canada.

The issue is that the foreign spouse did not reside at least one year in the jurisdiction that granted the divorce and there is information to reasonably assume that the other spouse did not live in the granting jurisdiction as well.

The Divorce Act of Canada requires that at least one of the parties to the divorce fulfill this residency requirement in order for the subsequent marriage to be recognized in Canada.

I was recently retained by a client who married her husband outside Canada.  We’ll call her Cathy. After marrying her husband, Cathy sponsored her husband’s application for permanent residence in Canada.  He was interviewed by a Canadian visa officer and was refused. Cathy could not understand why Regulation 117(9)(c)9i) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations applied to her and her husband.

I obtained a printout of the visa file.  Not only did the visa officer refuse the application because he was not satisfied the marriage was genuine, but also because Cathy’s sponsored spouse was still the spouse of another person at the time he and Cathy were married.  He and his ex-wife did not ordinarily reside for at least one year in the jurisdiction that granted the “quickie” divorce. Cathy’s husband was the spouse of another person because his divorce was not valid at the time he married Cathy.

This put Cathy in a legal conundrum.

No appeal is possible to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) for this type of refusal, because the IAD will only hear appeals involving members of the family class. The “husband” in this matter is not a member of the family class because he was not properly divorced from his ex-wife before marrying Cathy.  There is no way to argue this issue: it’s simply a fact.

Cathy had to seek a legal opinion from qualified counsel in the country in which the divorce should have been obtained, to determine if a divorce could now be granted to the husband and his ex-wife.  Cathy should have also sought a legal opinion from the country in which she and her husband were married, to determine if they could annul the marriage.

Note that an annulment is not the same as a divorce.  If the divorce from the ex-wife and the annulment of the current marriage are granted, then the client may consider marrying her husband and filing a new sponsorship application.  It would essentially allow Cathy and her husband to start from scratch.

In Cathy’s case, the government of where the marriage ceremony occurred did not require a legal opinion on whether the husband’s divorce was valid.  This is why in Ontario, the office of the Registrar General requires a lawyer’s opinion on whether a party who has a foreign divorce is free to remarry.  The lawyer must review the foreign divorce documents to determine if one or both persons to the divorce was ordinarily resident in the granting jurisdiction at least one year prior to beginning the divorce proceedings.  If the lawyer’s opinion is positive, the party with the foreign divorce is free to marry the other party.  The Registrar General then grants authorization to marry, which allows the parties to apply for a marriage licence.

In the cases I handle, after the parties marry, the spouse who is a citizen or permanent resident of Canada then begins the process of sponsoring their spouse in an application for permanent residence to Canada.

In hindsight, Cathy could have avoided her legal nightmare by seeking a legal opinion on whether her fiance had a valid divorce from his ex-wife.  It is money worth spending to protect oneself in the future.

Whether the marriage ceremony is at a government office, in a church, or on a beach, beware the perils of getting married outside of Canada to a person who has a divorce from elsewhere in their past.

Share This Post
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Trending Posts
Read More Insights
Events
By
Pace Law
Pace Law Firm is always looking to expand our business and elevate it to the next level. On Thursday November 24th, Pace Law Firm attended the Canadian Mortgage Summit (CMS) to hear from the industry’s top mortgage brokers, lenders and solution providers.
Firm News
By
Pace Law
We are proud to announce that Pace Law has become a multi-service firm and is launching a new website to accommodate our growth in different areas of law!
Events
By
Pace Law
The National Day for Truth and Reconciliation takes place on September 30th for the second consecutive year. Each year, September 30th marks both Orange Shirt Day and National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.
Real Estate Law
By
Pace Law
In key Canadian cities, the housing inventory may reach a crisis stage, according to a recent analysis from RE/MAX Canada. The analysis confirms that governments must take quick action to address the critically low supply of available homes.
Personal Injury
By
Pace Law
As the winter months get closer, it is critical to plan ahead and take precautions as needed to reduce the likelihood of mishaps. Nearly 30% of all motor vehicle incidents, according to recent RCMP data, happened on slick, snowy, or icy roadways.
Real Estate Law
By
Pace Law
Two weeks after the provincial administration submitted Bill 109, the More Homes for Everyone Act, 2022, on March 30, 2022, it obtained royal assent on April 14. The last step needed for a legislative measure to become law is royal assent.

Get in Touch

Call us now or fill out the form to discuss your case with an experienced legal professional.

Our Locations

Office Location

191 The West Mall, Suite 1100
Toronto, ON M9C 5K8
Phone: 1-877-236-3060
Fax: 416-236-1809

Office Location

191 The West Mall, Suite 1100
Toronto, ON M9C 5K8
Phone: 1-877-236-3060
Fax: 416-236-1809

Scroll to Top